Az.: S 12 KR 2059/20
München, 13. April 2021
Dem Kläger wurde heute ein Schreiben von Frau Wicke vom 8. April 2021 zugestellt. Dieses ist, abgesehen vom Datum, völlig identisch mit dem Schreiben vom 9. März 2021.
Folgt man der Simulationshypothese (siehe Anhang X5), dann ist eine Möglichkeit der Interpretation der Realität, daß die meisten gegenwärtigen Personen Simulationen, also keine real existierenden Menschen, sind. Die wiederholt identischen Vorträge von Frau Wicke, auch in anderen Belangen, unterstützen diese Hypothese. Es ist folglich denkbar, daß der Avatar rechtsbeugende Richterin der Simulation einen Programmierfehler enthält, welcher in einer endlosen Schleife immer wieder zur inhaltsgleichen Ausgabe von rechtlichem Unsinn führt (beispielhaft Anhang X4).
Frau Wicke wäre folglich keine echte Person. Würde sich das als richtig herausstellen, hätte das für Frau Wicke den Vorteil, daß das Strafrecht auf sie als Unperson keine Anwendung fände.
In der Welt real existierender Menschen bleibt für eine Anwendung von § 105 SGG hier jedoch kein Raum. Dies hatte der Kläger bereits im Schreiben vom 6. April 2021 (Zugang am folgenden Tag) vorgetragen.
Anhänge:
X4: Evidenz für Frau Wicke als falsch programmierter Avatar der Simulation
X5: Bostrom, Nick (2003). "Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?". Philosophical
Quarterly. 53 (211): 243–255.
[ 2 ](image) [ 3 ]
ARE YOU LIVING IN A COMPUTER SIMULATION?
BY NICK BOSTROM
[Published in Philosophical Quarterly (2003) Vol. 53, No. 211, pp. 243‐255. (First version: 2001)]
- This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor‐simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.
I. INTRODUCTION
Many works of science fiction as well as some forecasts by serious technologists and futurologists predict that enormous amounts of computing power will be available in the future. Let us suppose for a moment that these predictions are correct. One thing that later generations might do with their super‐powerful computers is run detailed simulations of their forebears or of people like their forebears. Because their computers would be so powerful, they could run a great many such simulations. Suppose that these simulated people are conscious (as they would be if the simulations were sufficiently fine‐grained and if a certain quite widely accepted position in the philosophy of mind is correct). Then it could be the case that the vast majority of minds like ours do not belong to the original race but rather to people simulated by the advanced descendants of an original race. It is then possible to argue that, if this were the case, we would be rational to think that we are likely among the simulated minds rather than among the original biological ones. Therefore, if we don’t think that we are currently living in a computer simulation, we are not entitled to believe that we will have descendants who will run lots of such simulations of their forebears. That is the basic idea. The rest of this paper will spell it out more carefully.
[..]